Turkish army and mercenaries attacked villages of Serêkaniyê

The Turkish state and its mercenaries attacked many villages of Serêkaniyê on Friday and met with the resistance of the SDF fighters who responded within the scope of self-defense. The invaders were dealt a heavy blow in the region.
The invading Turkish state and its mercenaries continue to violate the ceasefire agreement they have signed.
On Friday, the invading army and mercenaries carried out intensive attacks on the villages of Serêkaniyê. SDF fighters in the region also responded to the invasion attacks within the scope of self-defense.
The balance of the attacks in the region is as follows:
* Invading Turkish soldiers and mercenaries attacked the town of Zirgan in Serêkaniyê on Friday morning. The attacks continued uninterrupted until 1.30 pm. Responding to attacks within the scope of self-defense, SDF fighters repelled the action. A large number of invaders were killed and wounded, it was reported.
* Another village of Serêkaniyê attacked by invaders was Esadiyê. The invading Turkish army and mercenaries wanted to enter the village with panzers. The SDF fighters, protecting their posts, destroyed an occupiers vehicle in the village. The attacks here were repulsed.
* The mercenaries that attacked the village of Bir Noah in Serêkaniyê faced the resistance of the SDF fighters who were protecting their lands. Responding to attacks within the scope of self-defense, the SDF fighters destroyed a panzer belonging to the occupiers who tried to enter the village.
* In the village of Nuh, a group of 10 mercenaries tried to capture the posts of the SDF fighters. Several mercenaries were killed and wounded when faced with resistance.
* Another village attacked by the invaders was Menacir. Here too SDF fighter resisted the attacks and repelled the mercenaries, killing many.
* 2 civilians were wounded in the attacks against the village of Menacir.
* The invading Turkish state and its mercenaries attacked the village of Derdara in the east of Serêkaniyê with heavy weapons at around 3 pm on Friday. There were violent clashes in the region as SDF fighters responded to the attacks.
Related Articles
E se il modo di non pagare il loro debito in realtà ci fosse? François Chenais
Area Genova. Nella primavera del 2010 le grandi banche europee, in prima fila le banche francesi
Over twenty soldiers killed
Simultaneous attacks killed some 20 to 26 soldiers and wounded many Reports are coming through of twenty to twenty-six Turkish
Be your own media !
The “minds” behind The Rojava Report website are a group of students from different backgrounds. ANF interviewed them on why they felt more information on Rojava and more in general on the Kurdish issue is needed and how they tried to answer to this need by creating their own site.
How did the idea of a blog on Rojava come about ?
All of us who were involved in setting up the Rojava Report understood that there was a huge lack of information regarding what was happening in the region. When the media in the US spoke about the Kurds in Syria – and this itself was rare – it was always along the lines of ethnic or sectarian violence, or to give another example of the “intractability” of the conflict. It was always in terms of an “Arab-Kurdish” conflict, as a corollary or side-show to the “Alawite/Christian-Sunni” conflict that has been the dominant narrative in the mainstream media. In general we felt that those advancing the revolution in Rojava needed a platform from which their voices could be heard, and on which they could stake out their own vision for the future of their country and the Middle East more generally, without the reductionist narratives there are so common among out the major news outlets here. It was meant to be a more unfiltered, more direct source of news about what was happening in Rojava.
How is the Kurdish issue in general perceived in the States ?
Of course that depends on who you talk to. However even among people who consider themselves informed about events in the Middle East, and are sympathetic to a degree to Kurdish demands for national rights, there is a huge dearth of understanding about the complexities of Kurdish politics in the region and Kurdish aspirations for a new Middle East. In regards to Rojava in particular there is still an assumption that Kurds are – or at least the PYD is (if they can make the distinction) – “close to the regime” or at the very least unwilling to do much about it. This unfortunately was the dominant narrative until the beginning of the revolution last summer – I mean if you read anything in the Washington Post or the New York Times through the Spring of 2012 that is what you find (and forget the television channels because they never had time for the Kurds). Just google “Kurds on the sidelines” and see how many articles come up! Then the narrative began to shift slightly after the revolution and it became something along the lines of “Kurds are dividing the opposition.” I mean can you imagine? It was as if they could not make anyone happy, or at least not in a way that respected the principles of their movement. But that is just the point because that is all lost, and even now the YPG is treated as simply one more sectarian militia, while the entire content of their revolution and their politically ideology is buried under a simplistic discourse of “Kurdish nationalism” and “sectarian strife.”