Republicans attack Obama’s environmental protection from all sides
Environmental protection in US under attack from extremist Tea Partiers backed by big business
Suzanne Goldenberg
Republicans are moving to weaken the US’s environmental protection controls, including a ban on wolf hunting. Photograph: Riccardo Savi/Getty Images
It started on a sultry day in Houston when hundreds of protesters, mostly oil company employees, were bussed to a concert hall in their lunch hour to rally against a historic first step by Congress to reduce the pollution that causes climate change.
The event marked the start of a backlash by wealthy industry owners and conservative activists against Barack Obama’s green agenda. Now it has snowballed into what green campaigners say is the greatest assault on environmental protection that America has ever seen.
Eighteen months after that Houston rally, the green agenda is under assault on multiple fronts, from cutbacks in recycling in Wisconsin to the loosening of regulations governing coal mining in West Virginia and a challenge to the authority of the White House and federal government to act on climate change.
“This is almost unprecedented in environmental history, in that they are moving in so many directions and in so many ways to effect the same results that even if they are only partly successful, it will still have a serious outcome,” said Bill Becker, secretary of the National Association of Clean Air Agencies, which monitors air pollution.
“It is as if they are trying to throw as much slop against a wall as they can and hoping some of it sticks in the end. The more they throw the more they feel may stick, and they are throwing quite a bit.”
On Thursday Republicans introduced bills in both houses of Congress to strip the Obama administration of its powers to act on climate change. The bill introduced in the House and the Senate would bar the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) from using existing air pollution laws to reduce carbon dioxide.
It would stop the EPA from regulating carbon emissions from power plants and factories. It would not strike down a deal, reached between the White House and car makers, to reduce car emissions. But it would allow no further reductions in greenhouse gas emissions from cars once that deal runs out in 2016.
“The energy tax prevention act stops cap-and-trade regulations from taking effect once and for all,” said James Inhofe, the Oklahoma Republican who is the Senate’s most vocal climate change denier.
The bill is expected to pass easily in the House – where the Republicans are the majority, and where the bill has already gained support from a number of Democratic leaders. It will have a harder time in the Senate, where Democrats have a narrow majority.
But the bill represents only one line of attack. Last month’s Republican spending proposal, which set out $61bn (£38bn) in cuts, reserved the biggest cut of any government agency for the EPA: $3bn, or 30% of its budget.
Related Articles
“Para enfrentar la guerra del gran capital contra la humanidad, no hay más que construir poder desde abajo”
Entrevista con el líder peruano de la resistencia popular, Hugo Blanco Galdós Con la experiencia que le dan décadas de
Noam Chomsky sobre Siria: “Una agresión sin la autorización de la ONU sería un crimen de guerra”
Noam Chomsky Un ataque estadounidense contra Siria sin el apoyo de las Naciones Unidas sería un crimen de guerra,
Drug Companies’ Expansion Into Emerging Markets
Profit, Drugs, and International Markets Faced with declining prescription drug sales in the U.S., and having lost patent protection for