PROGRESSIVE ALLIANCE STRUGGLING TO GAIN STRENGHT
Socialists and social democrats in the Republic of Ireland have shown a weak and over all negative response to a vote transfer pact with other progressive election candidates. Would this pact fail it would open the door to a further five years of right-wing government in Dublin.
Trade union leaders had urged all those who signed up to the Right2Water anti-water charge campaign to transfer to other affiliates of the group, now known as ‘Right2Change’.
The group included a broad coalition of trade unions, civil society organisations, Sinn Fein, progressive political parties and independents stemming from the Right2Water movement. They had drawn-up a range of left-leaning policies which they hoped would be implemented by the next government in Dublin.
So far though the reaction from groups such as the Anti-Austerity Alliance has been broadly hostile.
Using tones reminding of the sectarian policies of the North of Ireland, Anti-Austerity Alliance Ruth Coppinger, said her organisation would not agree to forming a government with Sinn Fein, even if the numbers allowed, because of austerity cutbacks in the North. She added that the Right2Change campaign had become a “prop” for Sinn Fein. Her colleague Paul Murphy, the Socialist Dublin South-West deputy, blankly said he would not participate.
The Social Democrats, the new ‘left of centre’ party formed by TDs Roisin Shortall, Catherine Murphy and Stephen Donnelly, also declined to sign up to the new progressive platform.
Independent TDs such as Clare Daly and Mick Wallace have indicated their inclusion, although Donegal independent Peter Pringle said he was concerned that Sinn Fein could be using it to “maximise its vote”.
Not hiding her delight, Labour leader Joan Burton said the political alliance between Sinn Fein and left-wing parties and Independents was “over before it began”. Clearly the division within the left would in the end benefit the Labour party.
Meanwhile Sinn Fein deputy leader Mary Lou McDonald said it was “unforgivable” for left-wing groups not to grasp the opportunity of the broad policy platform and transfer pact. “We believe – she said – there is a great opportunity in the forthcoming election. We believe we need an alternative and a progressive government”.
Related Articles
PROCESSO BATERAGUNE, COME LO STATO SPAGNOLO NON SI RASSEGNA AL CAMBIO
Si è chiusa oggi la fase dibattimentale del processo denominato “Bateragune”, che vede sul banco degli imputati 8 dirigenti della
History destroyed in Sur: Concrete houses are sold for 1 million TL
Six neighbourhoods of the borough of Sur in Diyarbakır (Amed) have been banned for 5 years. Six neighbourhoods surrounded by concrete blocks first and then by 3 meters long iron sheets have been banned for 1,826 days.
LA NATO FUGGE DALLA PROPRIA MISSIONE – Thierry Meyssan
Traduzione per www.comedonchisciotte.org a cura di SUPERVICE
Reseau Voltaire. Dopo 150 giorni di bombardamenti, la NATO ha raso al suolo numerose infrastrutture, ma non ha ancora ottenuto un risultato effettivo. Questo insuccesso è imputabile all’assenza di una riflessione strategica preliminare. La NATO ha creduto di poter applicare in Libia il metodo classico che aveva concepito per altri scenari naturali. Si trova smarrita di fronte a un caso particolare. La più grande alleanza militare della Storia, che era stata formata per affrontare l’URSS e che poi aveva sognato di diventare il gendarme del pianeta, non ha azzeccato la sua riconversione.
Una vittoria o una disfatta militare si giudicano dagli obbiettivi di guerra che si erano prefissati. Nel caso dell’intervento della NATO in Libia, c’era un mandato delle Nazioni Unite, la protezione dei civili, e un scopo, allo stesso modo ufficiale ma fuori dal mandato, quello di cambiare il regime politico il paese.
Dopo quasi 150 giorni di guerra, la NATO non è riuscita a scuotere le istituzioni libiche. Tenuto conto della sproporzione delle forze, bisogna ammettere l’insuccesso militare e farsi delle domande sulla strategia adottata.