The collusion spin


The British government have been condemned for attempting to protect the
PSNI from the fallout of the Rosemary Nelson inquiry.

The damning report on the loyalist murder of the human rights lawyer in
1999 found the PSNI (then RUC) had abused, assaulted, and left her open
for eventual assassination at the hands of loyalist paramilitaries.

The public inquiry said it had found no direct Crown force role in the
murder of the 40-year-old mother-of-three, killed in a high-tech car
bombing in 1999, but said it could not rule out that elements of the
Crown forces may have assisted the killers.

It said it believed the deliberate leaking of Crown intelligence had
“increased the danger to Rosemary Nelson’s life”, while threats made
against the lawyer “had the subsequent effect of legitimising her as a
target in the eyes of loyalist terrorists”.

The report catalogued failures by the PSNI and the British government’s
Northern Ireland Office which resulted in a failure to warn Mrs Nelson
of the danger she faced or to offer her adequate protection.

The inquiry concluded: “The combined effect of these omissions by the
RUC and the NIO was that the state failed to take responsible and
proportionate steps to safeguard the life of Rosemary Nelson.”

British Direct Ruler Owen Paterson and PSNI Chief Matt Baggott have been
accused of deliberately downplaying the list of police misdeeds
identified in the report.

Sinn Fein President Gerry Adams said Mrs Nelson was indeed a victim of
collusion, disputing claims to the contrary.

In a statement, Mr Adams said “collusion took many forms in the north”
— “the family believes and the nationalist people of Lurgan and
Portadown believe that she was the victim of collusion. They are right.”

Mr Adams described Mrs Nelson as a lawyer who “stood up for what she
believed in and she sought to use the law – even one as corrupted as
that of the north during the years of conflict – as a means of defending
citizens from abuse and discrimination and as a means of achieving

Mrs Nelson was targeted by unionists and the police because he took on
the prominent role of legal adviser to a Catholic residents’ group that
opposed sectarian marches in the infamous Drumcree parade stand-off in
Portadown, advised the family of Robert Hamill, who was killed in a
sectarian attack in the town (in another case of RUC/PSNI collusion),
and successfully represented Lurgan republican and miscarriage of
justice victim Colin Duffy, who won several legal claims against police

Eunan Magee, Mrs Nelson’s brother, said the evidence against the PSNI,
Northern Ireland Office and PSNI Special Branch had been “damning”.

Fighting back tears at a press conference, he said that his sister had
been vindicated by the report.

“This is not a closed book and hopefully charges will be brought against
people who are guilty,” he said.

“She was a mother of three children, a decent human being who had lost
her life in pursuit of doing her job.

“No-one in the security services has been held accountable. Why after so
many years have the people who wronged Rosemary walked away with

He was critical of Owen Paterson’s comments that there had been no
collusion in the murder. He said: “If it sounds like a duck and it walks
like a duck, well, the chances are.”

Mrs Nelson’s bereaved husband Paul also spoke out over the findings of
the report. He said the relatives had been proved correct in pushing for
an independent investigation and said major findings had been made.

“I very much welcome this thorough and comprehensive report which I
believe vindicates Rosemary’s publicly expressed view that elements
within the RUC were unable to identify her as a professional lawyer and
distinguish her from the alleged crimes and causes of her clients,” he

“I am deeply saddened to read that the report concludes that the conduct
of some RUC officers had the affect of legitimising her as a target in
the eyes of loyalist terrorists.”

Mr Paterson later defended his handling of the report’s unveiling and
said he had accurately reflected its findings. “It is not for me to
second-guess the report,” he said.

But the attempt by both Paterson and the mainstream media to play down
the level of collusion involved in the murder has raised doubts that the
family of another high profile defence lawyer, Pat Finucane, can finally
attain justice for his death at the hands of admitted British agents.

Mr Adams said the circumstances surrounding that murder ten years
before, had allowed loyalists to kill Mrs Nelson.

“Tory Minister Douglas Hogg – standing up in the British Parliament and
accusing lawyers of working for the IRA and creating a context in which
lawyers could be murdered,” he said.

Mr Adams said collusion was widespread in the case: “The RUC not only
failed to act to prevent threats to her life but contributed to these
and created a context in which she became a target for loyalists.

“The actions of the RUC, its Special Branch and the NIO directly
contributed to the murder of Rosemary Nelson. That is collusion.

“The inquiry reveals a pattern of behaviour that all of these agencies
connived in her death. That is collusion.

“Moreover, knowing that she was at serious risk the state and its
security agencies, did nothing to prevent attack or help Mrs Nelson
protect herself. That is collusion.”


The investigation into Mrs Nelson’s death was laid out under the
conclusions of the Cory Collusion Inquiry, carried out by Judge Peter
Cory into allegations of collusion in six cases in the North.

During the inquiry, Judge Cory said collusion could be defined as “to
pretend ignorance or unawareness of something one ought morally, or
officially or legally to oppose”.

Mr Adams said by those terms, Rosemary Nelson was not the only victim of

“Sometimes it was the provision by British intelligence agencies,
directly through agents, of thousands of intelligence files, including
names, addresses, car registrations and movements.

“Sometimes individual members of the RUC and UDR participated in
sectarian attacks.

“Scores of UDR soldiers were convicted over the years of involvement in
sectarian murders; of providing British intelligence information for
unionist death squads; and of stealing weapons for use in killing

Related Articles



Dopo innumerevoli ostacoli del Governo colombiano di Alvaro Uribe, i guerriglieri delle Forze Armate Rivoluzionarie della Colombia (FARC) hanno liberato



Y a ellos se los tragó el asfalto. Si se los hubiera tragado la tierra, los habría vomitado”  

Lo ha fatto intendere il direttore della CIA Leon Panetta. Per arrivare a bin Laden i servizi segreti americani hanno estorto confessioni a Guantanamo, con metodi come il ‘waterboarding’ provocare asfissia al detenuto immergendo la testa nell’ acqua. I farisei si strappano le vesti quando è logico che sia così. Si ricorderà il film   “Soldato Blu” (Ralph Nelson, 1970), nel dialogo tra due “bianchi” dove si dice che “strappavamo lo scroto degli indiani per metterci il tabacco”. Fort Bragg dove i consiglieri statunitensi hanno formato centinaia di funzionari delle forze di sicurezza della America Latina, hanno elaborato delle tecniche di sterminio la cui perversione non ha limiti. Impalare bambini “perché sarebbero diventati terroristi”, (El Salvador) squartare (Colombia), ammazzare bambini sbattendoli contro le pietre (Guatemala) e decine di altre nefandezze. Il tutto per difendere la democrazia, dal pericolo allora “comunista”. Se questo mondo non fosse anche dominato dalla ipocrisia spocchiosa e criminale, la notizia del ‘waterboarding’ non sarebbe notizia, come un multa data per sosta vietata, ma naturale e logica parte integrante di “questa” democrazia. Come l’ esistenza dei bin Laden Noriega, Bokassa, Idi Amin, Mobtu, Pinochet etc etc Con le ammissioni di Panetta si sono sentiti sollevati, se mai avessero avuto qualche problema di coscienza, quei funzionari delle forze di sicurezza dello Stato spagnolo che la cultura del ‘waterboarding’, le cui origini sono medioevali (allora serviva a  combattere “gli eretici”), l’hanno applicata, un giorno si e uno anche, alle centinaia di baschi e basche arrestati in questi ultimi cinquant’anni.



los datos apuntan a que el partido republicano Sinn Féin obtendría unos muy buenos resultados, con opciones reales de convertirse en primer partido, una posible “sorpresa” por lo tanto ya anunciada para esta cita electoral

No comments

Write a comment
No Comments Yet! You can be first to comment this post!

Write a Comment