Norway’s attacks reveal world of hatred –Ahmed Moor
AlJazeera. The Norwegian terrorist who murdered more than ninety innocent civilians – many of whom were teenagers – did not act alone. Or rather, he acted within a cultural and political context that legitimises his fearful and hate-infested worldview. It is now clear that Anders Behring Breivik was exposed to large amounts of right-wing propaganda. This tragedy underlines the urgency with which normal people around the world must combat fundamentalist nationalists and chauvinists wherever they may be. But it also demonstrates the extent to which reactionary bigotry has infected mainstream thought.
Many reacted to the news from Oslo with wide eyes and a pointed finger. The most animated reactionaries took to the pages of the New York Times comment section to issue sweeping proclamations about the Clash of Civilisations and something called “the cult of death”. In many ways, readers were merely reinforcing the paper’s woefully editorialised reportage. As Glenn Greenwald helpfully pointed out, the editors of the NYT – America’s allegedly liberal newspaper – reserve the word “terrorist” solely for use in conjunction with the word “Muslim”.
When news emerged that the perpetrator of the murders – the terrorist – was a man whose religion and skin pigmentation closely resembled those of the editors of the NYT, the story changed. The terrorist became a deranged “Christian extremist” whose tactics clearly mirrored “Al Qaeda’s brutality and multiple attacks”. In that way, the paper linked the terrorist with Muslims, despite his strong antipathy for them.
Blame for the Western media’s panting pursuit of a non-existent Muslim triggerman quickly focused on the feckless, credulous, overeager and inept source of the NYT’s journalistic failure. Will McCants – proclaimed by one of his acolytes to be at the top of a “list of five terrorism experts you can trust” – was quickly discredited. In his defence, he only sought to affirm the confirmation bias that he and the editors of the NYT suffer from. The meme that underpins their worldview goes something like this: “Muslims are bad. When bad things happen, Muslims are responsible.” This is a mainstream view in the US today; it cuts across party lines.
Shaping both sides of the narrative
That the purported American left maintains this bigoted outlook is an indication of how successful the right has been at constructing the stage upon which public debate is conducted. Two main anti-Muslim talking points are now taken for granted in this country: First, all terrorists in the West are Muslims; second, we are in the midst of a global civilisational war. These are the dual planks upon which Uncle Sam squats in his Afghani outhouse.
Objective sources have done an excellent job of discrediting the first of the two claims that inform the 21st century American experience. The second point however – that we are engaged in a war of civilisations – is one that I agree with. But the combatants are not Islam and the West. Instead, the war is between the normal, sane people of the world and the right-wing zealots who see doom, destruction, hellfire and God’s Will at every turn.
Anders Behring Breivik, Mohammed Atta and Baruch Goldstein are all cut from the same rotten cloth. Anwar Al-Awlaki and Glenn Beck – the peddlers of the faith – all share the same core afflictions
These men are insecure, violently inclined, and illiberal. The outside world scares them. They hate homosexuals and strong women. For them, difference is a source of insecurity. Their values are militarism, conformism, chauvinism and jingoism. Worst of all they seek to pressure us into compliance while they work frantically to destroy themselves – and the rest of us with them.
The war continues
All indications are that the hate-mongers – who are on the same side of this war, irrespective of religion – are winning in America. The unreflective, superficial, wan editors of the NYT are an indication of just how successful the right wing has been at eviscerating the left.
But not all liberals are created equal.
It is a credit to the Norwegian people that their prime minister did not respond to the terror attack with scorched-earth rhetoric or a carpet-bombing campaign. A real liberal with strong principles, he did not succumb to fear or vicious speculation.
Instead, he pledged to strengthen Norwegian democracy. This is what he said shortly after the terrorist attacks: “Our answer is more democracy, more openness to show that we will not be stopped by this kind of violence.” His words illustrate the difference between a society that takes liberal principles as a foundation and one that treats them as an inconvenient luxury.
Prime Minister Jens Stoltenberg’s words make it clear where Norway stands on the global war on right-wing extremism. Where does the US stand?
Ahmed Moor is a Palestinian-American freelance journalist based in Cairo. He was born in the Gaza Strip, Palestine.
The views expressed in this article are the author’s own and do not necessarily reflect Al Jazeera’s editorial policy.
Fonte: http://english.aljazeera.net/indepth/opinion/2011/07/201172412744740495.html
Related Articles
LA STRATEGIA DEI CASSONETTI?
Che i processi di pace siano irti di ostacoli è cosa risaputa e constatabile. Se poi uno degli interlocutori frena
Court sentences MA journalist Sayılğan to 4 years’ imprisonment
Mezopotamya Agency journalist Idris Sayılğan was sentenced to 4 years in prison. The verdict hearing was held at the 2nd High Criminal Court in Muş.
HONDURAS: MASSACRO E BARBARIE NEL BAJO AGUAN – Giorgio Trucchi
È stato un vero massacro quello di lunedì 15 novembre, nella finca El Tumbador, municipio di Trujillo, nel nord dell’Honduras. Un esercito di più di 200 guardie di sicurezza del produttore di palma africana Miguel Facussé Barjum, presidente della Corporazione Dinant, ha attaccato con armi di grosso calibro i membri del Movimento contadino dell’Aguán, Mca, i quali avevano recuperato quelle stesse terre da oltre nove mesi. Terre che erano state usurpate loro dal sanguinario impresario per seminare palma africana.
L’attacco dei gruppi paramilitari ha lasciato un tragico saldo di cinque morti – Teodoro Acosta (45), Ignacio Reyes (50), Raúl Castillo, 45, Ciriaco Muñóz (45) e José Luis Sauceda Pastrana (32) -, uno scomparso – Noé Pérez – e vari feriti, alcuni dei quali sono ricoverati in gravi condizioni.
“Le guardie di Facussé sono arrivate alle 5 di mattino e hanno intimato ai contadini di abbandonare il luogo. Di fronte al rifiuto di questi ultimi hanno chiamato rinforzi. Sono arrivate più di 200 guardie e senza proferire parola hanno aperto il fuoco con armi di grosso calibro”, ha raccontato Santos Cruz, membro del Mca, alla Lista Informativa “Nicaragua y más” e a Sirel.
Secondo varie testimonianze, le guardie dell’impresario palmero hanno usato armi da guerra: AK-47, M-16 e fucili R-15. Hanno invaso la proprietà e hanno iniziato a inseguire i membri del Mca per più di quattro ore. Nemmeno la Polizia, che come sempre è arrivata quando la situazione si era calmata e il massacro consumato, è potuta entrare nel terreno, in quanto totalmente controllato e protetto dalle guardie. “È stato un massacro. Hanno sparato per uccidere. La gente scappava tra le palme, cercando di proteggersi. Ci sono ancora due compagni scomparsi (uno, José Luis Sauceda, è stato poi ritrovato assassinato con tre colpi di R-15 al volto dopo l’intervista ndr) e non sappiamo se si siano nascosti o se siano stati assassinati e i loro corpi sono ancora nella proprietà. Nessuno può entrare. Queste terre sono nostre e le difenderemo”, ha spiegato Cruz.